Good thread, Terri. Thanks.
For me, both the following statements have the ring of (possible) truth:
"I understand but I cannot accept."
"I accept though I do not understand."
A little bit like St-Anselm--who sincerely hoped that his faith would allow him to understand--my own hope is that my faith in the goodness of people will remove (or make less significant) the barriers to my accepting--if not to my understanding--another person.
Even though I consider myself fairly well versed in the ways and habits of human beings, I don't think I will ever truly understand another person. It would thus be awfully unfair of me to expect that from anyone else--SO or not. Still (or, maybe, because of this), I don't think understanding (as in "comprehension," not "sympathy") will ever be necessary in order for us to be able to accept another soul. One is akin to seeing things as they are (acceptance) while the other is trying to figure out what, exactly, it is that we're looking at (understanding). It's a minor miracle already that someone can accept another person. It's even more so that they can do it without understanding that person. I agree with Beauty; don't sell yourself short, in this regard, Terri.
Love,
CJ
